The CO2 fertilization effect or carbon fertilization effect causes an increased rate of photosynthesis while limiting leaf transpiration in plants. Both processes result from increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2).[1][2] The carbon fertilization effect varies depending on plant species, air and soil temperature, and availability of water and nutrients.[3][4] Net primary productivity (NPP) might positively respond to the carbon fertilization effect,[5] although evidence shows that enhanced rates of photosynthesis in plants due to CO2 fertilization do not directly enhance all plant growth, and thus carbon storage.[3] The carbon fertilization effect has been reported to be the cause of 44% of gross primary productivity (GPP) increase since the 2000s.[6] Earth System Models, Land System Models and Dynamic Global Vegetation Models are used to investigate and interpret vegetation trends related to increasing levels of atmospheric CO2.[3][7] However, the ecosystem processes associated with the CO2 fertilization effect remain uncertain and therefore are challenging to model.[8][9]

Terrestrial ecosystems have reduced atmospheric CO2 concentrations and have partially mitigated climate change effects.[10] The response by plants to the carbon fertilization effect is unlikely to significantly reduce atmospheric CO2 concentration over the next century due to the increasing anthropogenic influences on atmospheric CO2.[2][3][11][12] Earth's vegetated lands have shown significant greening since the early 1980s[13] largely due to rising levels of atmospheric CO2.[14][15][16][17]

Theory predicts the tropics to have the largest uptake due to the carbon fertilization effect, but this has not been observed. The amount of uptake from fertilization also depends on how forests respond to climate change, and if they are protected from deforestation.[18]

Changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide may reduce the nutritional quality of some crops, with for instance wheat having less protein and less of some minerals.[19]: 439[20] Food crops could see a reduction of protein, iron and zinc content in common food crops of 3 to 17%.[21]

Mechanism

Main article: Photosynthesis

Through photosynthesis, plants use CO2 from the atmosphere, water from the ground, and energy from the sun to create sugars used for growth and fuel.[22] While using these sugars as fuel releases carbon back into the atmosphere (photorespiration), growth stores carbon in the physical structures of the plant (i.e. leaves, wood, or non-woody stems).[23] With about 19 percent of Earth's carbon stored in plants,[24] plant growth plays an important role in storing carbon on the ground rather than in the atmosphere. In the context of carbon storage, growth of plants is often referred to as biomass productivity.[23][25][26] This term is used because researchers compare the growth of different plant communities by their biomass, amount of carbon they contain.

Increased biomass productivity directly increases the amount of carbon stored in plants.[23] And because researchers are interested in carbon storage, they are interested in where most of the biomass is found in individual plants or in an ecosystem. Plants will first use their available resources for survival and support the growth and maintenance of the most important tissues like leaves and fine roots which have short lives.[27] With more resources available plants can grow more permanent, but less necessary tissues like wood.[27]

If the air surrounding plants has a higher concentration of carbon dioxide, they may be able to grow better and store more carbon[28] and also store carbon in more permanent structures like wood.[23] Evidence has shown this occurring for a few different reasons. First, plants that were otherwise limited by carbon or light availability benefit from a higher concentration of carbon.[29] Another reason is that plants are able use water more efficiently because of reduced stomatal conductance.[30] Plants experiencing higher CO2 concentrations may benefit from a greater ability to gain nutrients from mycorrhizal fungi in the sugar-for-nutrients transaction.[31] The same interaction may also increase the amount of carbon stored in the soil by mycorrhizal fungi.[32]

From 2002 to 2014, plants appear to have gone into overdrive, starting to pull more CO2 out of the air than they have done before.[33] The result was that the rate at which CO2 accumulates in the atmosphere did not increase during this time period, although previously, it had grown considerably in concert with growing greenhouse gas emissions.[33]

A 1993 review of scientific greenhouse studies found that a doubling of concentration would stimulate the growth of 156 different plant species by an average of 37%. Response varied significantly by species, with some showing much greater gains and a few showing a loss. For example, a 1979 greenhouse study found that with doubled concentration the dry weight of 40-day-old cotton plants doubled, but the dry weight of 30-day-old maize plants increased by only 20%.[34][35]

In addition to greenhouse studies, field and satellite measurements attempt to understand the effect of increased in more natural environments. In free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) experiments plants are grown in field plots and the concentration of the surrounding air is artificially elevated. These experiments generally use lower levels than the greenhouse studies. They show lower gains in growth than greenhouse studies, with the gains depending heavily on the species under study. A 2005 review of 12 experiments at 475–600 ppm showed an average gain of 17% in crop yield, with legumes typically showing a greater response than other species and C4 plants generally showing less. The review also stated that the experiments have their own limitations. The studied levels were lower, and most of the experiments were carried out in temperate regions.[36] Satellite measurements found increasing leaf area index for 25% to 50% of Earth's vegetated area over the past 35 years (i.e., a greening of the planet), providing evidence for a positive CO2 fertilization effect.[37][38]

Depending on environment, there are differential responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 between major 'functional types' of plant, such as C3 plant and C4 carbon fixation plants, or more or less woody species; which has the potential among other things to alter competition between these groups.[39][40] Increased CO2 can also lead to increased Carbon : Nitrogen ratios in the leaves of plants or in other aspects of leaf chemistry, possibly changing herbivore nutrition.[41] Studies show that doubled concentrations of CO2 will show an increase in photosynthesis in C3 plants but not in C4 plants.[42] However, it is also shown that plants are able to persist in drought better than the plants.[43]

Experimentation by enrichment

The effects of enrichment can be most simply attained in a greenhouse (see Greenhouse § Carbon dioxide enrichment for its agricultural use). However, for experimentation, the results obtained in a greenhouse would be doubted due to it introducing too many confounding variables. Open-air chambers have been similarly doubted, with some critiques attributing, e.g., a decline in mineral concentrations found in these -enrichment experiments to constraints put on the root system. The current state-of-the art is the FACE methodology, where is put out directly in the open field.[44] Even then, there are doubts over whether the results of FACE in one part of the world applies to another.[45]

Free-Air Enrichment (FACE) experiments

Main article: Free-air concentration enrichment

The ORNL conducted FACE experiments where levels were increased above ambient levels in forest stands.[46] These experiments showed:[47]

  • Increased root production stimulated by increased , resulting in more soil carbon.
  • An initial increase of net primary productivity, which was not sustained.
  • Faster decline in nitrogen availability in increased forest plots.
  • Change in plant community structure, with minimal change in microbial community structure.[48]
  • Enhanced cannot significantly increase the leaf carrying capacity or leaf area index of an area.[48]

FACE experiments have been criticized as not being representative of the entire globe. These experiments were not meant to be extrapolated globally. Similar experiments are being conducted in other regions such as in the Amazon rainforest in Brazil.[45]

Pine trees

Duke University did a study where they dosed a loblolly pine plantation with elevated levels of .[49] The studies showed that the pines did indeed grow faster and stronger. They were also less prone to damage during ice storms, which is a factor that limits loblolly growth farther north. The forest did relatively better during dry years. The hypothesis is that the limiting factors in the growth of the pines are nutrients such as nitrogen, which is in deficit on much of the pine land in the Southeast. In dry years, however, the trees do not bump up against those factors since they are growing more slowly because water is the limiting factor. When rain is plentiful trees reach the limits of the site's nutrients and the extra is not beneficial. Most forest soils in Southeastern region are deficient in nitrogen and phosphorus as well as trace minerals. Pine forests often sit on land that was used for cotton, corn or tobacco. Since these crops depleted originally shallow and infertile soils, tree farmers must work to improve soils.

See also

References

  1. ^ Ueyama M, Ichii K, Kobayashi H, Kumagai TO, Beringer J, Merbold L, Euskirchen ES, Hirano T, Marchesini LB, Baldocchi D, Saitoh TM (2020-07-17). "Inferring CO2 fertilization effect based on global monitoring land-atmosphere exchange with a theoretical model". Environmental Research Letters. 15 (8): 084009. Bibcode:2020ERL....15h4009U. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab79e5. hdl:10449/64408. ISSN 1748-9326
  2. ^ Tharammal T, Bala G, Narayanappa D, Nemani R (April 2019). "Potential roles of CO2 fertilization, nitrogen deposition, climate change, and land use and land cover change on the global terrestrial carbon uptake in the twenty-first century". Climate Dynamics. 52 (7–8): 4393–4406. Bibcode:2019ClDy...52.4393T. doi:10.1007/s00382-018-4388-8. ISSN 0930-7575. S2CID 134286531
  3. ^ Hararuk O, Campbell EM, Antos JA, Parish R (December 2018). "Tree rings provide no evidence of a CO2 fertilization effect in old-growth subalpine forests of western Canada". Global Change Biology. 25 (4): 1222–1234. Bibcode:2019GCBio..25.1222H. doi:10.1111/gcb.14561. PMID 30588740
  4. ^ Cartwright J (Aug 16, 2013). "How does carbon fertilization affect crop yield?". environmentalresearchweb. Environmental Research Letters. Archived 27 June 2018 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 3 October 2016.
  5. ^ Smith WK, Reed SC, Cleveland CC, Ballantyne AP, Anderegg WR, Wieder WR, Liu YY, Running SW (March 2016). "Large divergence of satellite and Earth system model estimates of global terrestrial CO2 fertilization". Nature Climate Change. 6 (3): 306–310. Bibcode:2016NatCC...6..306K. doi:10.1038/nclimate2879. ISSN 1758-678X
  6. ^ Chen C, Riley WJ, Prentice IC, Keenan TF (March 2022). "CO2 fertilization of terrestrial photosynthesis inferred from site to global scales". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 119 (10). Bibcode:2022PNAS..11915627C. doi:10.1073/pnas.2115627119. PMC 8915860. PMID 35238668
  7. ^ Bastos A, Ciais P, Chevallier F, Rödenbeck C, Ballantyne AP, Maignan F, Yin Y, Fernández-Martínez M, Friedlingstein P, Peñuelas J, Piao SL (2019-10-07). "Contrasting effects of CO2 fertilization, land-use change and warming on seasonal amplitude of Northern Hemisphere CO2 exchange". Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 19 (19): 12361–12375. Bibcode:2019ACP....1912361B. doi:10.5194/acp-19-12361-2019. hdl:10150/635011. ISSN 1680-7324
  8. ^ Li Q, Lu X, Wang Y, Huang X, Cox PM, Luo Y (November 2018). "Leaf Area Index identified as a major source of variability in modelled CO2 fertilization". Biogeosciences. 15 (22): 6909–6925. doi:10.5194/bg-2018-213
  9. ^ Albani M, Medvigy D, Hurtt GC, Moorcroft PR (December 2006). "The contributions of land-use change, fertilization, and climate variability to the Eastern US carbon sink: Partitioning of the Eastern US Carbon Sink". Global Change Biology. 12 (12): 2370–2390. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01254.x. S2CID 2861520
  10. ^ Wang S, Zhang Y, Ju W, Chen JM, Ciais P, Cescatti A, Sardans J, Janssens IA, Wu M, Berry JA, Campbell E, Fernández-Martínez M, Alkama R, Sitch S, Friedlingstein P, Smith WK, Yuan W, He W, Lombardozzi D, Kautz M, Zhu D, Lienert S, Kato E, Poulter B, Sanders TG, Krüger I, Wang R, Zeng N, Tian H, Vuichard N, Jain AK, Wiltshire A, Haverd V, Goll DS, Peñuelas J (December 2020). "Recent global decline of CO2 fertilization effects on vegetation photosynthesis". Science. 370 (6522): 1295–1300. Bibcode:2020Sci...370.1295W. doi:10.1126/science.abb7772. hdl:10067/1754050151162165141. PMID 33303610. S2CID 228084631
  11. ^ Sugden AM (2020-12-11). "A decline in the carbon fertilization effect". Science. 370 (6522): 1286.5–1287. Bibcode:2020Sci...370S1286S. doi:10.1126/science.370.6522.1286-e. S2CID 230526366
  12. ^ Kirschbaum MU (January 2011). "Does enhanced photosynthesis enhance growth? Lessons learned from enrichment studies". Plant Physiology. 155 (1): 117–24. doi:10.1104/pp.110.166819. PMC 3075783. PMID 21088226
  13. ^ "Global Green Up Slows Warming". earthobservatory.nasa.gov. 2020-02-18. Retrieved 2020-12-27.
  14. ^ Tabor A (2019-02-08). "Human Activity in China and India Dominates the Greening of Earth". NASA. Retrieved 2020-12-27.
  15. ^ Zhu Z, Piao S, Myneni RB, Huang M, Zeng Z, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Sitch S, Friedlingstein P, Arneth A, Cao C (2016-08-01). "Greening of the Earth and its drivers". Nature Climate Change. 6 (8): 791–795. Bibcode:2016NatCC...6..791Z. doi:10.1038/nclimate3004. S2CID 7980894
  16. ^ Hille K (2016-04-25). "Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds". NASA. Retrieved 2020-12-27.
  17. ^ "If you're looking for good news about climate change, this is about the best there is right now". Washington Post. Retrieved 2016-11-11.
  18. ^ Schimel D, Stephens BB, Fisher JB (January 2015). "Effect of increasing on the terrestrial carbon cycle". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 112 (2): 436–41. Bibcode:2015PNAS..112..436S. doi:10.1073/pnas.1407302112. PMC 4299228. PMID 25548156
  19. ^ Mbow C, Rosenzweig C, Barioni LG, Benton TG, Herrero M, Krishnapillai M, Liwenga E, Pradhan P, Rivera-Ferre MG, Sapkota T, Tubiello FN (2019). "Chapter 5: Food Security". Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems
  20. ^ Milius S (13 December 2017). "Worries grow that climate change will quietly steal nutrients from major food crops". Science News. Retrieved 21 January 2018.
  21. ^ Smith MR, Myers SS (27 August 2018). "Impact of anthropogenic CO2 emissions on global human nutrition". Nature Climate Change. 8 (9): 834–839. Bibcode:2018NatCC...8..834S. doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0253-3. ISSN 1758-678X. S2CID 91727337
  22. ^ Calvin M, Benson AA (March 1948). The Path of Carbon in Photosynthesis. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. pp. 884–922.
  23. ^ Walker AP, De Kauwe MG, Bastos A, Belmecheri S, Georgiou K, Keeling RF, McMahon SM, Medlyn BE, Moore DJ, Norby RJ, Zaehle S, Anderson-Teixeira KJ, Battipaglia G, Brienen RJ, Cabugao KG, Cailleret M, Campbell E, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Craig ME, Ellsworth DS, Farquhar GD, Fatichi S, Fisher JB, Frank DC, Graven H, Gu L, Haverd V, Heilman K, Heimann M, Hungate BA, Iversen CM, Joos F, Jiang M, Keenan TF, Knauer J, Körner C, Leshyk VO, Leuzinger S, Liu Y, MacBean N, Malhi Y, McVicar TR, Penuelas J, Pongratz J, Powell AS, Riutta T, Sabot ME, Schleucher J, Sitch S, Smith WK, Sulman B, Taylor B, Terrer C, Torn MS, Treseder KK, Trugman AT, Trumbore SE, van Mantgem PJ, Voelker SL, Whelan ME, Zuidema PA (March 2021). "Integrating the evidence for a terrestrial carbon sink caused by increasing atmospheric CO2". The New Phytologist. 229 (5): 2413–2445. Bibcode:2021NewPh.229.2413W. doi:10.1111/nph.16866. PMID 32789857
  24. ^ "Forests and Climate Change". www.fao.org. Retrieved 2021-03-24.
  25. ^ Sivamani E, Bahieldin A, Wraith JM, Al-Niemi T, Dyer WE, Ho TD, Qu R (June 2000). "Improved biomass productivity and water use efficiency under water deficit conditions in transgenic wheat constitutively expressing the barley HVA1 gene". Plant Science. 155 (1): 1–9. Bibcode:2000PlnSc.155....1S. doi:10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00247-2. PMID 10773334
  26. ^ Singh SP, Adhikari BS, Zobel DB (1994). "Biomass, Productivity, Leaf Longevity, and Forest Structure in the Central Himalaya". Ecological Monographs. 64 (4): 401–421. Bibcode:1994EcoM...64..401S. doi:10.2307/2937143. ISSN 1557-7015. JSTOR 2937143
  27. ^ De Kauwe MG, Medlyn BE, Zaehle S, Walker AP, Dietze MC, Wang YP, Luo Y, Jain AK, El-Masri B, Hickler T, Wårlind D, Weng E, Parton WJ, Thornton PE, Wang S, Prentice IC, Asao S, Smith B, McCarthy HR, Iversen CM, Hanson PJ, Warren JM, Oren R, Norby RJ (August 2014). "Where does the carbon go? A model-data intercomparison of vegetation carbon allocation and turnover processes at two temperate forest free-air enrichment sites". The New Phytologist. 203 (3): 883–99. doi:10.1111/nph.12847. PMC 4260117. PMID 24844873
  28. ^ Walker AP, De Kauwe MG, Medlyn BE, Zaehle S, Iversen CM, Asao S, Guenet B, Harper A, Hickler T, Hungate BA, Jain AK, Luo Y, Lu X, Lu M, Luus K, Megonigal JP, Oren R, Ryan E, Shu S, Talhelm A, Wang YP, Warren JM, Werner C, Xia J, Yang B, Zak DR, Norby RJ (February 2019). "Decadal biomass increment in early secondary succession woody ecosystems is increased by CO2 enrichment". Nature Communications. 10 (1): 454. Bibcode:2019NatCo..10..454W. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08348-1. PMC 6376023. PMID 30765702
  29. ^ Lloyd J, Farquhar GD (May 2008). "Effects of rising temperatures and [] on the physiology of tropical forest trees". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 363 (1498): 1811–7. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.0032. PMC 2374913. PMID 18267901
  30. ^ Medlyn BE, Duursma RA, Eamus D, Ellsworth DS, Prentice IC, Barton CV, Crous KY, De Angelis P, Freeman M, Wingate L (2011). "Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance". Global Change Biology. 17 (6): 2134–2144. Bibcode:2011GCBio..17.2134M. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02375.x. hdl:10453/18084. ISSN 1365-2486. S2CID 51814113
  31. ^ Fleischer K, Rammig A, De Kauwe MG, Walker AP, Domingues TF, Fuchslueger L, Garcia S, Goll DS, Grandis A, Jiang M, Haverd V (September 2019). "Amazon forest response to CO2 fertilization dependent on plant phosphorus acquisition". Nature Geoscience. 12 (9): 736–741. Bibcode:2019NatGe..12..736F. doi:10.1038/s41561-019-0404-9. ISSN 1752-0908. S2CID 199448766
  32. ^ Orwin KH, Kirschbaum MU, St John MG, Dickie IA (May 2011). "Organic nutrient uptake by mycorrhizal fungi enhances ecosystem carbon storage: a model-based assessment". Ecology Letters. 14 (5): 493–502. Bibcode:2011EcolL..14..493O. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01611.x. PMID 21395963
  33. ^ Krotz D (2016-11-08). "Study: Carbon-Hungry Plants Impede Growth Rate of Atmospheric | Berkeley Lab". News Center. Retrieved 2016-11-11.
  34. ^ Poorter H. "Interspecific variation in the growth response of plants to an elevated ambient concentration"
  35. ^ Wong SC (December 1979). "Elevated Partial Pressure of and Plant Growth". Oecologia. 44 (1): 68–74. Bibcode:1979Oecol..44...68W. doi:10.1007/BF00346400. PMID 28310466. S2CID 24541633
  36. ^ Ainsworth L (February 2005). "What have we learned from 15 years of free-air enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising .". New Phytol.. 165 (2): 351–71. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01224.x. PMID 15720649
  37. ^ Zhu Z, Piao S, Myneni RB, Huang M, Zeng Z, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Sitch S, Friedlingstein P, Arneth A, Cao C (August 2016). "Greening of the Earth and its drivers". Nature Climate Change. 6 (8): 791–95. Bibcode:2016NatCC...6..791Z. doi:10.1038/nclimate3004. ISSN 1758-6798. S2CID 7980894 We show a persistent and widespread increase of growing season integrated LAI (greening) over 25% to 50% of the global vegetated area, whereas less than 4% of the globe shows decreasing LAI (browning). Factorial simulations with multiple global ecosystem models suggest that fertilization effects explain 70% of the observed greening trend
  38. ^ Hille K (2016-04-25). "Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds". NASA. Retrieved 2018-02-04.
  39. ^ Giam, Xingli; Bradshaw, Corey J.A.; Tan, Hugh T.W.; Sodhi, Navjot S. (July 2010). "Future habitat loss and the conservation of plant biodiversity". Biological Conservation. 143 (7): 1594–1602. Bibcode:2010BCons.143.1594G. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.019. ISSN 0006-3207
  40. ^ Jeffrey S. Dukes & Harold A. Mooney (April 1999). "Does global change increase the success of biological invaders?". Trends Ecol. Evol.. 14 (4): 135–9. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01554-7. PMID 10322518
  41. ^ Gleadow RM et al. (1998). "Enhanced CO2 alters the relationship between photosynthesis and defence in cyanogenic Eucalyptus cladocalyx F. Muell.". Plant Cell Environ.. 21 (1): 12–22. Bibcode:1998PCEnv..21...12G. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1998.00258.x
  42. ^ HAMIM (December 2005). "Photosynthesis of C3 and C4 Species in Response to Increased CO 2 Concentration and Drought Stress". HAYATI Journal of Biosciences. 12 (4): 131–138. doi:10.1016/s1978-3019(16)30340-0. ISSN 1978-3019
  43. ^ Sternberg, Marcelo; Brown, Valerie K.; Masters, Gregory J.; Clarke, Ian P. (1999-07-01). "Plant community dynamics in a calcareous grassland under climate change manipulations". Plant Ecology. 143 (1): 29–37. Bibcode:1999PlEco.143...29S. doi:10.1023/A:1009812024996. ISSN 1573-5052. S2CID 24847776
  44. ^ Loladze I (May 2014). "Hidden shift of the ionome of plants exposed to elevated CO₂ depletes minerals at the base of human nutrition". eLife. 3. doi:10.7554/elife.02245. PMC 4034684. PMID 24867639
  45. ^ "Amazon FACE Experiment". Mar 28, 2015. ORNL. Archived August 9, 2017 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved Nov 23, 2019.
  46. ^ "Oak Ridge Experiment on Enrichment of Sweetgum: Experimental design". ORNL. Jun 29, 2009. Archived January 9, 2018 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved Nov 23, 2019.
  47. ^ Norby R. "Free-Air Enrichment (FACE)". ORNL. Retrieved Nov 23, 2019.
  48. ^ Norby RJ, Zak DR (2011). "Ecological Lessons from Free-Air Enrichment (FACE) Experiments". Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 42 (1): 181–203. doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144647. ISSN 1543-592X. S2CID 85977324
  49. ^ "Duke Study Shows Carbon Dioxide Boosts Pine Tree Reproduction". Sciencedaily.com. 16 August 2000. Retrieved 9 March 2013.