| Election name | 1962 Quebec general election |
|---|---|
| Country | Quebec |
| Ongoing | no |
| Party colour | no |
| Party name | no |
| Previous election | 1960 Quebec general election |
| Previous year | 1960 |
| Previous mps | 26th Quebec Legislature |
| Next election | 1966 Quebec general election |
| Next year | 1966 |
| Elected members | 27th Quebec Legislature |
| Seats for election | 95 seats in the 27th Legislative Assembly of Quebec 48 seats were needed for a majority |
| Election date | November 14, 1962 |
| Leader 1 | Jean Lesage |
| Leader since 1 | May 31, 1958 |
| Leaders seat 1 | Québec-Ouest |
| Last election 1 | 51 seats, 51.38% |
| Seats 1 | 63 |
| Seat change 1 | 12 |
| Popular vote 1 | 1,205,253 |
| Percentage 1 | 56.40% |
| Swing 1 | 5.02% |
| Leader 2 | Daniel Johnson Sr. |
| Leader since 2 | September 23, 1961 |
| Leaders seat 2 | Bagot |
| Last election 2 | 43 seats, 46.61% |
| Seats 2 | 31 |
| Seat change 2 | 12 |
| Popular vote 2 | 900,817 |
| Percentage 2 | 42.15% |
| Swing 2 | 4.46% |
| Before election | Jean Lesage |
| After election | Jean Lesage |
| Posttitle | Premier after election |
The 1962 Quebec general election was held on November 14, 1962, to elect members of the Legislative Assembly of the Province of Quebec, Canada. The incumbent Quebec Liberal Party, led by Jean Lesage, was re-elected, defeating the (UN) led by Daniel Johnson, Sr.
In an unusual move, the election was called just two years after the previous 1960 general election. Lesage sought a mandate for the nationalization of the electrical power industry, using the slogan none: Maîtres chez nous, lit. 'Masters in our own home', and declaring it to be the single issue on which he was ready to stake his political career.
A few days before the election, the 's chief organizer, André Lagarde, was arrested for fraud. The Liberals claimed this was proof of lingering corruption dating from the Maurice Duplessis era, but the UN cried foul. While the courts eventually acquitted Lagarde after the election, the incident may well have contributed to the UN's defeat.
The Liberal Party won an increased number of seats and a higher percentage of the popular vote compared to the previous election. Their majority government allowed them to pursue their campaign promise of electricity nationalization, spearheaded by future founder René Lévesque, who at the time served as a cabinet minister in the Lesage government.
, a new group founded by Hertel Larocque (a former secretary of Camillien Houde),[1] fielded 11 candidates in the election but failed to gather a significant number of votes. Johnson opted not to have the UN join forces with it, keeping in mind the failure the Liberals had had in attempting the same manoeuvre with the in 1956.[1] However, Social Credit was still a force to reckon with even while not campaigning on the provincial scene,[1] and Johnson did not hesitate to use its vocabulary in his speeches while on the campaign trail.[2]
| Candidates | Lib | UN | Ind | I-Lib | I-UN | AP | Con | Comm | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 67 | 67 | 134 | ||||||
| 3 | 24 | 24 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 72 |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | ||||
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | ||
| Total | 95 | 95 | 9 | 10 | 2 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 224 |
Results
[3] |- ! colspan=2 rowspan=2 | Political party ! rowspan=2 | Party leader ! colspan=4 | MPPs ! colspan=4 | Votes |- ! Candidates !1960 !1962 !± !# ! ± !% ! ± (pp)
|style="text-align:left;"|Jean Lesage | 95 || 52 || 63 || 11 || 1,205,253 || 128,118 || 56.40% || 5.02
|style="text-align:left;"|Daniel Johnson, Sr. | 95 || 42 || 31 || 11 || 900,817 || 76,490 || 42.15% || 4.46
| || 9 || 1 || 1 || || 13,581 || 8,606 || 0.64% || 0.42 |- |rowspan="6" | |style="text-align:left;" colspan="10"|Other candidates |- |colspan="2" style="text-align:left;" | | 10 || || || || 11,209 || 3,001 || 0.52% || 0.13 |- |colspan="2" style="text-align:left;" | | 1 || || || || 4,255 || 4,255 || 0.20% || New |- |colspan="2" style="text-align:left;" | | 11 || || || || 1,445 || 1,445 || 0.07% || New |- |colspan="2" style="text-align:left;" | | 2 || || || || 336 || 10,195 || 0.02% || 0.48 |- |colspan="2" style="text-align:left;" | | 1 || || || || 71 || 465 || 0.00% || 0.03 |- ! colspan="3" style="text-align:left;" | Total |224||95 ! " colspan="2"|95 ! " colspan="2"|2,136,967 ! " colspan="2"| 100% |- | colspan="7" style="text-align:left;" | Rejected ballots | 29,509 | 4,012 | colspan="2"| |- | colspan="7" style="text-align:left;" | Voter turnout | 2,166,476 | 36,369 | 79.59 | 2.07 |- | colspan="7" style="text-align:left;" | Registered electors | 2,721,933 | 113,494 | colspan="2"| |}
- ^ including spoilt ballots
Vote and seat summaries
| Party | Seats | Votes | Change (pp) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Synopsis of results
| Riding | Winning party | Turnout [a 1] | Votes | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | 1960 | Party | Votes | Share | Margin # | Margin % | Lib | UN | Ind | I-Lib | AP | Other | Total | ||||||
| Abitibi-Est | Lib | Lib | 14,892 | 51.93% | 1,109 | 3.87% | 85.24% | 14,892 | 13,783 | – | – | – | – | 28,675 | |||||
| Abitibi-Ouest | Lib | Lib | 6,732 | 56.97% | 1,648 | 13.95% | 88.52% | 6,732 | 5,084 | – | – | – | – | 11,816 | |||||
| Argenteuil | UN | UN | 7,922 | 54.57% | 2,610 | 17.98% | 86.22% | 5,312 | 7,922 | – | 1,284 | – | – | 14,518 | |||||
| Arthabaska | Lib | Lib | 10,988 | 53.54% | 1,453 | 7.08% | 91.70% | 10,988 | 9,535 | – | – | – | – | 20,523 | |||||
| Bagot | UN | UN | 5,336 | 55.11% | 989 | 10.21% | 92.36% | 4,347 | 5,336 | – | – | – | – | 9,683 | |||||
| Beauce | Lib | UN | 12,583 | 51.96% | 947 | 3.91% | 87.25% | 11,636 | 12,583 | – | – | – | – | 24,219 | |||||
| Beauharnois | UN | Lib | 11,884 | 51.72% | 791 | 3.44% | 90.19% | 11,884 | 11,093 | – | – | – | – | 22,977 | |||||
| Bellechasse | Lib | UN | 5,176 | 51.35% | 273 | 2.71% | 80.81% | 4,903 | 5,176 | – | – | – | – | 10,079 | |||||
| Berthier | UN | Lib | 5,938 | 50.05% | 110 | 0.93% | 85.57% | 5,938 | 5,828 | – | – | 98 | – | 11,864 | |||||
| Bonaventure | Lib | Lib | 9,525 | 57.28% | 2,421 | 14.56% | 85.26% | 9,525 | 7,104 | – | – | – | – | 16,629 | |||||
| Bourget | Lib | Lib | 42,906 | 58.74% | 17,728 | 24.27% | 73.21% | 42,906 | 25,178 | 4,807 | – | 153 | – | 73,044 | |||||
| Brome | Lib | Lib | 3,417 | 55.82% | 713 | 11.65% | 81.43% | 3,417 | 2,704 | – | – | – | – | 6,121 | |||||
| Chambly | Lib | Lib | 36,290 | 63.83% | 17,094 | 30.07% | 76.89% | 36,290 | 19,196 | 778 | 353 | – | 235 | 56,852 | |||||
| Champlain | UN | UN | 12,346 | 52.74% | 1,282 | 5.48% | 90.97% | 11,064 | 12,346 | – | – | – | – | 23,410 | |||||
| Charlevoix | UN | Lib | 6,942 | 52.23% | 594 | 4.47% | 87.21% | 6,942 | 6,348 | – | – | – | – | 13,290 | |||||
| Châteauguay | UN | Lib | 8,727 | 54.83% | 1,538 | 9.66% | 84.04% | 8,727 | 7,189 | – | – | – | – | 15,916 | |||||
| Chicoutimi | UN | UN | 16,910 | 50.29% | 192 | 0.57% | 88.05% | 16,718 | 16,910 | – | – | – | – | 33,628 | |||||
| Compton | UN | UN | 5,568 | 54.45% | 1,014 | 9.92% | 87.30% | 4,554 | 5,568 | – | – | 104 | – | 10,226 | |||||
| Deux-Montagnes | Lib | Lib | 8,518 | 57.31% | 2,174 | 14.63% | 86.94% | 8,518 | 6,344 | – | – | – | – | 14,862 | |||||
| Dorchester | UN | UN | 7,818 | 53.64% | 1,060 | 7.27% | 83.78% | 6,758 | 7,818 | – | – | – | – | 14,576 | |||||
| Drummond | Lib | Lib | 14,621 | 57.17% | 3,668 | 14.34% | 90.97% | 14,621 | 10,953 | – | – | – | – | 25,574 | |||||
| Duplessis | Lib | Lib | 7,345 | 59.84% | 2,416 | 19.68% | 79.19% | 7,345 | 4,929 | – | – | – | – | 12,274 | |||||
| Frontenac | UN | UN | 6,217 | 52.46% | 582 | 4.91% | 87.92% | 5,635 | 6,217 | – | – | – | – | 11,852 | |||||
| Gaspé-Nord | Lib | UN | 5,183 | 51.75% | 444 | 4.43% | 88.07% | 4,739 | 5,183 | 93 | – | – | – | 10,015 | |||||
| Gaspé-Sud | UN | Lib | 7,197 | 50.40% | 113 | 0.79% | 89.09% | 7,197 | 7,084 | – | – | – | – | 14,281 | |||||
| Gatineau | UN | Lib | 10,289 | 54.57% | 1,725 | 9.15% | 77.83% | 10,289 | 8,564 | – | – | – | – | 18,853 | |||||
| Hull | Lib | Lib | 14,854 | 63.36% | 6,266 | 26.73% | 78.05% | 14,854 | 8,588 | – | – | – | – | 23,442 | |||||
| Huntingdon | UN | UN | 3,449 | 54.14% | 528 | 8.29% | 85.15% | 2,921 | 3,449 | – | – | – | – | 6,370 | |||||
| Iberville | Lib | Lib | 4,452 | 55.87% | 936 | 11.75% | 91.07% | 4,452 | 3,516 | – | – | – | – | 7,968 | |||||
| Îles-de-la-Madeleine | UN | Lib | 2,674 | 51.86% | 192 | 3.72% | 92.10% | 2,674 | 2,482 | – | – | – | – | 5,156 | |||||
| Jacques-Cartier | Lib | Lib | 69,199 | 77.74% | 49,388 | 55.49% | 72.46% | 69,199 | 19,811 | – | – | – | – | 89,010 | |||||
| Joliette | UN | UN | 10,236 | 52.96% | 5,037 | 26.06% | 85.90% | 5,199 | 10,236 | – | 3,891 | – | – | 19,326 | |||||
| Jonquière-Kénogami | Lib | Lib | 16,100 | 60.38% | 5,536 | 20.76% | 86.48% | 16,100 | 10,564 | – | – | – | – | 26,664 | |||||
| Kamouraska | UN | Lib | 5,453 | 50.19% | 41 | 0.38% | 82.02% | 5,453 | 5,412 | – | – | – | – | 10,865 | |||||
| L'Assomption | Lib | Lib | 9,680 | 55.06% | 1,984 | 11.29% | 84.49% | 9,680 | 7,696 | – | 70 | 134 | – | 17,580 | |||||
| L'Islet | Lib | UN | 5,239 | 53.25% | 639 | 6.49% | 83.90% | 4,600 | 5,239 | – | – | – | – | 9,839 | |||||
| Labelle | UN | UN | 6,005 | 57.11% | 1,695 | 16.12% | 84.51% | 4,310 | 6,005 | 199 | – | – | – | 10,514 | |||||
| Lac-Saint-Jean | Lib | Lib | 9,171 | 52.63% | 915 | 5.25% | 89.25% | 9,171 | 8,256 | – | – | – | – | 17,427 | |||||
| Laval | Lib | Lib | 67,316 | 66.31% | 33,807 | 33.30% | 76.57% | 67,316 | 33,509 | – | 461 | 237 | – | 101,523 | |||||
| Laviolette | UN | UN | 11,315 | 53.63% | 1,533 | 7.27% | 85.24% | 9,782 | 11,315 | – | – | – | – | 21,097 | |||||
| Lévis | Lib | Lib | 13,434 | 54.43% | 2,346 | 9.51% | 88.47% | 13,434 | 11,088 | 158 | – | – | – | 24,680 | |||||
| Lotbinière | UN | UN | 6,393 | 53.56% | 849 | 7.11% | 88.62% | 5,544 | 6,393 | – | – | – | – | 11,937 | |||||
| Maisonneuve | UN | Lib | 28,814 | 58.89% | 8,702 | 17.79% | 71.75% | 28,814 | 20,112 | – | – | – | – | 48,926 | |||||
| Maskinongé | UN | UN | 5,312 | 53.71% | 734 | 7.42% | 91.18% | 4,578 | 5,312 | – | – | – | – | 9,890 | |||||
| Matane | Lib | Lib | 8,204 | 50.40% | 130 | 0.80% | 83.20% | 8,204 | 8,074 | – | – | – | – | 16,278 | |||||
| Matapédia | Lib | Lib | 6,111 | 51.05% | 252 | 2.11% | 84.29% | 6,111 | 5,859 | – | – | – | – | 11,970 | |||||
| Mégantic | Lib | Lib | 13,182 | 55.05% | 2,420 | 10.11% | 88.95% | 13,182 | 10,762 | – | – | – | – | 23,944 | |||||
| Missisquoi | UN | UN | 7,630 | 57.38% | 1,962 | 14.75% | 84.84% | 5,668 | 7,630 | – | – | – | – | 13,298 | |||||
| Montcalm | UN | Lib | 4,662 | 55.41% | 911 | 10.83% | 88.54% | 4,662 | 3,751 | – | – | – | – | 8,413 | |||||
| Montmagny | Lib | UN | 5,747 | 50.49% | 111 | 0.98% | 86.57% | 5,636 | 5,747 | – | – | – | – | 11,383 | |||||
| Montmorency | UN | UN | 5,717 | 50.67% | 398 | 3.53% | 88.32% | 5,319 | 5,717 | – | – | 247 | – | 11,283 | |||||
| Montréal–Jeanne-Mance | UN | Lib | 40,899 | 59.64% | 13,740 | 20.04% | 68.18% | 40,899 | 27,159 | 519 | – | – | – | 68,577 | |||||
| Montréal-Laurier | Lib | Lib | 15,837 | 58.16% | 4,563 | 16.76% | 76.41% | 15,837 | 11,274 | – | – | 117 | – | 27,228 | |||||
| Montréal-Mercier | UN | Lib | 16,992 | 54.07% | 3,322 | 10.57% | 75.56% | 16,992 | 13,670 | – | 764 | – | – | 31,426 | |||||
| Montréal–Notre-Dame-de-Grâce | Lib | Lib | 37,100 | 78.55% | 29,357 | 62.15% | 59.89% | 37,100 | 7,743 | – | 2,389 | – | – | 47,232 | |||||
| Montréal-Outremont | Lib | Lib | 36,076 | 77.63% | 26,647 | 57.34% | 60.34% | 36,076 | 9,429 | 969 | – | – | – | 46,474 | |||||
| Montréal–Saint-Henri | Lib | Lib | 17,548 | 53.04% | 2,540 | 7.68% | 70.28% | 17,548 | 15,008 | – | 531 | – | – | 33,087 | |||||
| Montréal–Saint-Jacques | UN | UN | 7,854 | 52.10% | 705 | 4.68% | 65.65% | 7,149 | 7,854 | – | – | – | 71 | 15,074 | |||||
| Montréal–Saint-Louis | Lib | Lib | 14,082 | 58.15% | 3,949 | 16.31% | 60.95% | 14,082 | 10,133 | – | – | – | – | 24,215 | |||||
| Montréal–Sainte-Anne | Ind | Ind | 6,058 | 45.84% | 746 | 5.65% | 57.89% | 5,312 | 1,845 | 6,058 | – | – | – | 13,215 | |||||
| Montréal–Sainte-Marie | UN | UN | 12,977 | 52.47% | 1,321 | 5.34% | 67.43% | 11,656 | 12,977 | – | – | – | 101 | 24,734 | |||||
| Montréal-Verdun | Lib | Lib | 21,208 | 65.98% | 10,274 | 31.96% | 72.80% | 21,208 | 10,934 | – | – | – | – | 32,142 | |||||
| Napierville-Laprairie | UN | Lib | 9,865 | 56.53% | 2,278 | 13.05% | 86.33% | 9,865 | 7,587 | – | – | – | – | 17,452 | |||||
| Nicolet | UN | Lib | 7,209 | 51.74% | 484 | 3.47% | 85.96% | 7,209 | 6,725 | – | – | – | – | 13,934 | |||||
| Papineau | UN | UN | 12,304 | 55.28% | 2,351 | 10.56% | 85.66% | 9,953 | 12,304 | – | – | – | – | 22,257 | |||||
| Pontiac | UN | UN | 5,108 | 59.81% | 1,675 | 19.61% | 75.86% | 3,433 | 5,108 | – | – | – | – | 8,541 | |||||
| Portneuf | Lib | Lib | 11,059 | 51.34% | 702 | 3.26% | 85.36% | 11,059 | 10,357 | – | – | 124 | – | 21,540 | |||||
| Québec-Centre | UN | Lib | 9,750 | 55.13% | 1,813 | 10.25% | 84.08% | 9,750 | 7,937 | – | – | – | – | 17,687 | |||||
| Québec-Comté | Lib | Lib | 34,090 | 57.80% | 9,196 | 15.59% | 87.07% | 34,090 | 24,894 | – | – | – | – | 58,984 | |||||
| Québec-Est | UN | Lib | 21,001 | 52.20% | 1,767 | 4.39% | 88.59% | 21,001 | 19,234 | – | – | – | – | 40,235 | |||||
| Québec-Ouest | Lib | Lib | 14,582 | 67.91% | 7,692 | 35.82% | 88.24% | 14,582 | 6,890 | – | – | – | – | 21,472 | |||||
| Richelieu | Lib | Lib | 10,598 | 55.61% | 2,137 | 11.21% | 90.11% | 10,598 | 8,461 | – | – | – | – | 19,059 | |||||
| Richmond | Lib | Lib | 9,932 | 57.88% | 2,703 | 15.75% | 85.16% | 9,932 | 7,229 | – | – | – | – | 17,161 | |||||
| Rimouski | Lib | Lib | 10,720 | 52.22% | 911 | 4.44% | 82.70% | 10,720 | 9,809 | – | – | – | – | 20,529 | |||||
| Rivière-du-Loup | Lib | Lib | 8,493 | 51.22% | 403 | 2.43% | 85.70% | 8,493 | 8,090 | – | – | – | – | 16,583 | |||||
| Roberval | Lib | UN | 11,172 | 51.23% | 537 | 2.46% | 85.07% | 10,635 | 11,172 | – | – | – | – | 21,807 | |||||
| Rouville | UN | Lib | 6,575 | 56.08% | 1,426 | 12.16% | 86.80% | 6,575 | 5,149 | – | – | – | – | 11,724 | |||||
| Rouyn-Noranda | Lib | Lib | 9,386 | 60.06% | 3,144 | 20.12% | 85.50% | 9,386 | 6,242 | – | – | – | – | 15,628 | |||||
| Saguenay | Lib | Lib | 12,116 | 57.35% | 3,106 | 14.70% | 78.97% | 12,116 | 9,010 | – | – | – | – | 21,126 | |||||
| Saint-Hyacinthe | Lib | Lib | 12,070 | 56.30% | 2,701 | 12.60% | 84.85% | 12,070 | 9,369 | – | – | – | – | 21,439 | |||||
| Saint-Jean | Lib | Lib | 8,869 | 50.55% | 866 | 4.94% | 89.57% | 8,869 | 8,003 | – | 672 | – | – | 17,544 | |||||
| Saint-Maurice | Lib | Lib | 15,684 | 55.73% | 3,224 | 11.46% | 88.19% | 15,684 | 12,460 | – | – | – | – | 28,144 | |||||
| Saint-Sauveur | UN | UN | 12,641 | 51.43% | 702 | 2.86% | 89.13% | 11,939 | 12,641 | – | – | – | – | 24,580 | |||||
| Shefford | UN | UN | 12,026 | 50.01% | 800 | 3.33% | 85.22% | 11,226 | 12,026 | – | 794 | – | – | 24,046 | |||||
| Sherbrooke | Lib | Lib | 18,539 | 52.46% | 1,825 | 5.16% | 81.29% | 18,539 | 16,714 | – | – | 86 | – | 35,339 | |||||
| Stanstead | Lib | Lib | 8,918 | 56.32% | 2,101 | 13.27% | 84.29% | 8,918 | 6,817 | – | – | 99 | – | 15,834 | |||||
| Témiscamingue | UN | Lib | 4,102 | 52.98% | 462 | 5.97% | 87.18% | 4,102 | 3,640 | – | – | – | – | 7,742 | |||||
| Témiscouata | UN | UN | 5,931 | 60.69% | 2,089 | 21.38% | 82.38% | 3,842 | 5,931 | – | – | – | – | 9,773 | |||||
| Terrebonne | Lib | Lib | 26,901 | 58.98% | 8,188 | 17.95% | 85.00% | 26,901 | 18,713 | – | – | – | – | 45,614 | |||||
| Trois-Rivières | UN | UN | 15,323 | 51.75% | 1,036 | 3.50% | 89.96% | 14,287 | 15,323 | – | – | – | – | 29,610 | |||||
| Vaudreuil-Soulanges | Lib | Lib | 10,780 | 57.49% | 2,809 | 14.98% | 90.45% | 10,780 | 7,971 | – | – | – | – | 18,751 | |||||
| Verchères | Lib | Lib | 6,827 | 58.51% | 1,985 | 17.01% | 87.62% | 6,827 | 4,842 | – | – | – | – | 11,669 | |||||
| Westmount–Saint-Georges | Lib | Lib | 13,114 | 69.03% | 11,486 | 60.46% | 59.04% | 13,114 | 1,628 | – | – | – | 4,255 | 18,997 | |||||
| Wolfe | Lib | UN | 3,939 | 52.92% | 481 | 6.46% | 90.26% | 3,458 | 3,939 | – | – | 46 | – | 7,443 | |||||
| Yamaska | UN | UN | 4,078 | 60.16% | 1,377 | 20.31% | 84.60% | 2,701 | 4,078 | – | – | – | – | 6,779 | |||||
- = open seat
- = turnout is above provincial average
- = winning candidate was in previous Legislature
- = incumbent had switched allegiance
- = not incumbent; was previously elected to the Legislature
- = incumbency arose from byelection gain
- = other incumbents renominated
- = multiple candidates
Analysis
| Party in 1st place | Party in 2nd place | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lib | UN | Con | |||
| 62 | 1 | 63 | |||
| 31 | 31 | ||||
| 1 | 1 | ||||
| Total | 32 | 62 | 1 | 95 | |
| Parties | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 63 | 62 | 2 | |||
| 31 | 52 | 1 | |||
| 1 | 7 | 1 | |||
| 1 | |||||
| 9 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 8 | 2 | ||||
| 1 | 1 | ||||
| 1 |
| Source | Party | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lib | UN | Ind | Total | ||
| Seats retained | Incumbents returned | 43 | 21 | 1 | 65 |
| Open seats held | 2 | 2 | 4 | ||
| Byelection loss reversed | 1 | 1 | |||
| Seats changing hands | Incumbents defeated | 17 | 5 | 22 | |
| Incumbents defeated - previous incumbents returned | 1 | 1 | |||
| Open seats gained | 1 | 1 | |||
| Byelection gain held | 1 | 1 | |||
| Total | 63 | 31 | 1 | 95 | |
See also
- List of Quebec premiers
- Politics of Quebec
- Timeline of Quebec history
- List of Quebec political parties
- Quiet Revolution
- 27th Legislative Assembly of Quebec
References
- ^ Lemieux 1969, p. 18.
- ^ Lemieux 1969, p. 19.
- ^ Drouilly, Pierre (November 7, 2017). "Élections québécoises de 1962". donneesquebec.ca. Atlas des élections au Québec.
- ^ "Les membres de l'Assemblée nationale par circonscription" [National Assembly members by riding] (in French). National Assembly of Quebec. Retrieved September 13, 2023.
Works cited
- Lemieux, Vincent (ed.) (1969). Quatre élections provinciales au Québec [Four provincial elections in Quebec] (in French). Montreal: Les presses de l'Université Laval.
Further reading
- Canadian Annual Review for 1962. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 1963.